Certainty is the real advantage in 2026

Most office moves go wrong long before the fit-out starts.

They go wrong because decisions happen in the wrong order. The building is chosen before the brief is proven. Heads of terms are agreed before the budget is tested. The programme is assumed rather than properly mapped.

D2 Real Estate’s Channel Islands Office Market Review 2026 reinforces why that sequencing matters more this year. Prime supply in Guernsey is tightening. Rents are firming. Supply constraints mean occupiers have less flexibility to delay decisions.

The market has not stopped, but it has become more cautious.

And in a cautious market, certainty becomes the advantage.

Certainty around the brief.
Certainty around cost.
Certainty around programme.

That is the real advantage in 2026.


Guernsey is increasingly a two-speed office market

One of the most useful takeaways in the report is the widening gap between prime and everything else.

Prime space behaves like a tight market: fewer genuine options, quicker decision cycles, and less room for compromise. Even where overall vacancy exists, the best floors and buildings remain scarce. That is why prime headline rents can rise while secondary space still requires sharper pricing and stronger deal terms to transact.

For occupiers, that two-speed reality changes the balance of risk:

Prime buildings: the risk is missing the window and settling for a compromise.
Secondary buildings: the risk is underestimating what it will take to make the space genuinely work, and what that will cost.

In both cases, certainty is the advantage.


Incentives: what’s quoted and what gets agreed

In a two-speed market, incentives are rarely standard. They are building-specific.

In practice, incentives are based on a simple mix of factors: void risk, asset competitiveness, covenant strength, term length, and the building's readiness to occupy. The same headline rent can conceal very different effective deals once rent-free periods, capital contributions, Cat A upgrades, landlord works, and a realistic dilapidations position are factored in. On some mid-tier space, the effective position can look materially different once all of that is included.

The mistake is anchoring on the headline benchmark.

Without validated scope, cost and programme clarity, negotiation becomes reactive rather than strategic.


The real risk is not rent. It is uncertainty.

Most relocations do not derail because the fit-out is difficult.

They derail because certainty arrives too late.

• A building is selected before the brief is clear.
• Heads of terms are agreed before the budget is credible.
• Move dates are set before approvals, and long-lead constraints are understood.

Uncertainty typically shows up in three places.

  • Hybrid working has made requirements harder to define. Many teams know what is not working but struggle to translate that into what the next office must deliver: the right balance of focused work and collaboration, meeting space, privacy, storage, client-facing experience, flexibility for growth, and non-negotiables.

    When the brief is vague, late change follows. So does design-by-committee. Both are expensive.

  • A space can be technically compliant and still fail day to day: too noisy, not enough privacy, awkward circulation, undersized support areas, or a layout that works on a calm Tuesday but struggles on a busy Monday.

    These issues are best discovered early through proper test fits and walkthrough visuals.

    A floorplan is not a workplace strategy.

  • If you build a credible budget after heads of terms, you have negotiated backwards.

    The same applies to programme risk. Landlord approvals, Licences to Alter, surveys, compliance, IT and comms, services capacity, enabling works, and long-lead MEP, AV and furniture often sit on the critical path. Identified late, they reduce your ability to shape scope or negotiate effectively.

A practical response: replace guesswork with proof

Planning earlier only works if it removes uncertainty.

That does not require a drawn-out strategy exercise. It requires a focused sprint that answers four questions:

• What do we need now and next?
• Can this building deliver it without painful compromise?
• What will it cost at a credible, decision-ready level?
• What is the real programme once approvals and procurement are properly mapped?

When those questions are answered early, decisions accelerate, stakeholders align faster, and lease negotiations improve.


What occupiers should do before committing to a building

This is the work that sits between property and delivery. It is where risk is either reduced or amplified.

  • • Stakeholder sessions to define goals and constraints
    • A short staff pulse to identify friction points
    • A clear workplace brief that sets priorities and non-negotiables

    This is not paperwork. It is clarity.

  • Not one layout. Not one optimistic option.

    Pressure-test the realities:

    • balance of focused work and collaboration
    • acceptable compromises
    • peak-time performance
    • servicing and structural constraints

    Add walkthrough visuals so stakeholders can sign off with confidence.

  • A high-level cost plan does two things:

    • removes guesswork
    • creates negotiation leverage

    It strengthens discussions around rent-free periods, capital contributions, landlord works, enabling upgrades and handover milestones.

  • Relocations are not just fit-outs. Search, negotiation, approvals, procurement and move management all carry weight.

    The goal is not longer timelines. It is control of the critical path.

The takeaway for Guernsey occupiers in 2026

In a cautious market, the winners are rarely the fastest.

They are the most prepared.

The occupiers who build clarity early, validate buildings properly and negotiate with evidence consistently secure stronger outcomes.

If a lease event or relocation is even a possibility in the next 12 to 36 months, the first step is not viewing space.

It is validating it properly.


Talk to us

If you would value a second opinion on feasibility, costs or programme sequencing on your upcoming project, we are always happy to review a shortlist and share what we typically look for.

Next
Next

A better question to ask about your workplace this year